A good overview and makes a point I’ve been trying to make, which is that while the Interstate Highway System certainly accelerated urban sprawl that it started long before then.
It’s all a misunderstanding by marketing people. Technical people, when explaining network architecture, would always draw the part between the local infrastructure and the infrastructure at the other end as a cloud. Why? Because who knows what infrastructure is there? I don’t. OneNet knows part of it but only to wherever they peer with the next provider along the line. After that, who knows? Anyway, the marketing people seemed to have started referring to “the cloud” not long after Wi-Fi became popular. I swear they think it’s an actual cloud.
But I digress.
Interesting article just the same. Not surprised to read that the STM has an 80% pass usage rate given that they’ve had monthly passes for over 30 years. The app thing is interesting, at least as far as notification of service disruptions goes. I don’t want offers from vendors based on where I am or what I’m doing, but there are probably a lot more people that do than those of us that don’t.
I started this a month ago and never finished. Yonah is pretty well-respected as a transit pundit but something about this article isn’t sitting right with me. Only I don’t know what it is.
Something about percentages? If the total population in an area grows from, say, 1,000,000 to 1,500,000, which seems more than reasonable for a 30-year period but the transit mode share drops from, say, 6% to 4% the same 60,000 people are riding at the beginning and the end. So the transit ridership was flat, but the mode share declined because the population increased. Did transit add capacity? Were they at capacity at the beginning? The end? Dunno, not in the article.
Yonah compares these cities unfavorably with Atlantic City, NJ. What he doesn’t say is that transit in AC has an enviable 28% share, right between Chicago and San Francisco … but that the population of the entire AC metro is only about 300k. Portland has 2x that in the municipality alone and about 2.3M in the metro. Can you even compare the two? I dunno – I’m not that smart.
Still an interesting article but something doesn’t sit well with me.