The new Mid-City Rapid isn’t much faster or more dependable than the regular bus it replaced, leaving the El Cajon Boulevard community grasping for the transportation solution it was promised, even while it undergoes a development boom.
Source: Rapid Bus Isnt as Rapid as Everyone Hoped – Voice of San Diego
The article makes it seem like this particular bus line is a failure. The more I read about it, though, the more it seems like it’s less a failure than a project that oversold its benefits. And despite the cost, seems to have been cheaped out at some point.
It’s surely not BRT and near as I can tell doesn’t even have rudimentary things like off-board fare collection. MTS claims that the vehicles “were designed to streamline and accelerate the boarding process and feature multiple doors, low-floor designs and larger windows” but multiple-door boarding is not the same has having multiple doors. Sheesh. A lot of money was spent on the half-dozen or so Rapid routes and even their operation was contracted out to Veolia I suppose to make it seem different (and surely to bust the ATU). A lot is still left to be desired, though; like the total absence of exclusive lanes. They do, at least, have signal pre-emption and next-bus signs at stops.
BUT … ridership on the route is up 18% since the service replaced the former 15 route in October, 2014. No definitive word, but likely reasons for the increase are that SDSU students trying to get to or from downtown San Diego are saving time, that the route has a long span of service (>20 hours/day), and it has excellent peak/off-peak/late headways (10/15/30 minutes).
Implying that this route is somehow a failure misses the mark. Less than what was promised? Yes. Could things be made better? Absolutely. Do we want to look closely at whether it was worth the cost? Yeah, probably not. But please, credit where some credit is due.
The FORWARD plan brings frequency and all-week service to the heartland.
Source: Omaha Just Improved Its Mass Transit System Without Spending Any Money – CityLab
These stories keep coming out. Houston just did the same thing. OKC, too. Jarrett Walker says that the community needs to make a decision: is it more important to serve as many areas as possible, or is it more important to increase ridership, with the understanding that neither answer is right or wrong. You can do a little of both but you can’t really have both unless you want to spend a lot more money.
Here, Omaha has made a bunch of routes a lot more useful, but they reduced the number of areas served or at best, required longer walks to stops. The time scales for people on foot or bicycle to get to the nearest stop is brilliant. I don’t think I’ve seen that before.
Leonard Nimoy, March 26, 1931 – February 27, 2015.
Article: The Many Flavors of Transit | Transportationist.
So the comments are off on the article and clicking the reblog button did … something (though I know not what) … The Press This button at the bottom of the article failed too, but the one on my browser did not.
I get the point of the article – transit-oriented doesn’t just mean they have a good subway or a good bus system. But the list I don’t get. There are not 33 individual categories on the list! Click above to the read the article and see the original list.
In fact, you could argue that there are only two categories of transit on the list here: Scheduled and on-demand. The first list below shows scheduled services and the second on-demand. The third list is … I don’t know. My guess is that some are scheduled and some are on-demand.
Without getting into the mode silos or trivia, there is little difference between PATH subways and MTA subways other than destination. Likewise for the 3.5 commuter rail lines listed (and Amtrak) or the bus services. Or the jitneys or the car services …
Two categories. Not 33.
- MTA subways
- PATH subways
- MTA buses
- New Jersey Transit buses
- Metro-North Rail Road
- Long Island Rail Road
- New Jersey Transit trains
- Staten Island Ferry
- Staten Island Rail Road
- Commuter ferries (Five licensed operators)
- Chinatown buses (intercity)
- Low cost intercity buses (Bolt Bus, Mega Bus)
- Conventional intercity buses (Greyhound, Peter Pan)
- Company/corporate shuttles
- University shuttles (Columbia University, New York University)
- Roosevelt Island Tram (Gondola)
- Roosevelt Island Red Bus (Publicly owned development corporation)
- Water taxis
- Access-a-Ride (MTA and other transit provider contracts)
- Yellow taxicabs (Medallion cabs)
- Green taxicabs (Boro cabs)
- Liveries for Hire (Uber, Lyft, Carmel, etc.)
- Executive Limousines
- Liveries (informal)
- CitiBike bike share (public access for a fee)
- University bike share programs (free access for a designated group)
Could be either – no idea
- Apartment shuttles (CoSo, etc.)
- Commuter vans (licensed and pre-arranged fares; e.g. Mario’s Transportation)
- Dollar vans and local jitneys (informal immigrant services)
- New Jersey commuter jitneys
- Long Island commuter jitneys
- Executive helicopters